Showing posts with label Cow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cow. Show all posts

Friday, August 16, 2013

URU - 2013 - #010 - SERIE - PROMINENT PERSONALITIES OF URUGUAY, NIBYA MARIÑO


Uruguay - 2013 - Prominent personalities of Uruguay, Nibya Mariño


Options:

SERIE --- 1,40 EUR
SERIE [1X2] with LABEL --- 3,20 EUR
SERIE [2X2] with LABEL --- 5,60 EUR
BLOCK --- 10,00 EUR
FDC not Sent --- 2,80 EUR
FDC Sent on First Day --- 9,00 EUR
COVER Sent on First Day --- 6,00 EUR

If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.



Issue information:

Country: Uruguay
Date: March 22nd, 2013
Printed: 15.000 copies

Stamp Shape and Size: Rectangular [39 mm. x 27 mm.]
Perforation: Circular
Gum: Water Activated

Block Configuration: 8 stamps [3 x 3] and one Label at position 2,2
[ [STAMP, STAMP, STAMP]
[STAMP, LABEL, STAMP]
[STAMP, STAMP, STAMP] ]
Block Shape and Size: Rectangular [150 mm. x 133 mm.]

FDC Type: Special for this issue
FDC Shape and Size: Rectangular [169 mm. x 89 mm.]
Cover Shape and Size: Rectangular [241 mm. x 159 mm.]

Catalogue information:

Michel: No Data Available
Ivert: No Data Available
Scott: No Data Available
Stanley & Gibbons: No Data Available

Topics:

Issue:

This stamp is a new release of an annually that is being issued since last year about prominent personalities of Uruguay. This year, the honour of being chosen for this serie, it is for Nibya Mariño, a contemporary classical pianist from Uruguay.

The stamp, which was released just one day before the 94th birthday of Nibya, shows a picture of her, deeply concentrated and with fierce attitude, with his hands over a black grand piano, in one of his recent concertos.

The design is completed with the logo of the serie with the legend "Personalidades destacadas del Uruguay", that in english means "Prominent personalities of Uruguay", crossed with a white and sky-blue national ribbon, and bellow of this legend, the name of the pianist honoured.

This release repeats the block configuration introduced in the eight issue of this year about soccer team "Defensor", and adds an unique label in the center position of the block, making it a valuable collector item, as it exist only one for each eight stamps that composes the block. Both Label and block design will be described later, each one in their respective sections.

In relation to the annually serie, this second release shows that there is from a wide domain that the personalities are selected, as the other personality selected was from a completely different activity, as it was Enrique Iglesias, an also contemporanean, however an economist man, that received global recognition after being elected president of the Inter-American Development Bank in 1988.

Finally, another topics that could be considered to be present in this stamp are: women, music, musical instruments, wood, and gray hair.

Nybia Marino Bellini was born on March 23th of 1919 in Montevideo, and is a worldwide known Uruguayan classical pianist.

He began his musical training being very small with Master William Kolischer. He debuted at the age of six years, and only a few years later, still being a little girl, she gives a concert at the theater "Colón" in Buenos Aires, playing the Concerto in LA minor Op 54 by Robert Schumann, under the direction of Ernest Ansermet.

He traveled to Paris to improve her technique, where she took part in several competitions, standing out his performance in Brussels, in the Isaye contest, where she was the best and get very good returns. From there, Mariño began a series of concerts throughout Europe, Latin America and the United States.

He continued her studies in the United States with Claudio Arrau, considered the greatest pianist in the world. In this country recorded three CDs, two works by Schumann and the other with the Concerto for Two Pianos of Poulenc with the also Uruguayan Enrique Graf and an orchestra, under the direction of David Stohl.

She had played in the most important theaters of the world, both in the U.S. and Europe. He formed a remembered duo with Hugo Balzo. In 1994 she received an award from the Organization of American States (OAS) for her contribution to the artistic community of the Americas.

In late March 2009 he was honored for his 90 years of life. The concert, organized by SODRE Symphony Orchestra under the direction of maestro Piero Gamba, included the Piano Concerto No. 4 Op 58 by Ludwig van Beethoven.

She is married to Walter Pintos Surmani (son of well known uruguayan architect Walter Pintos Risso), and is the mother of Sergio Pintos Marino.

The piano is a musical instrument played by means of a keyboard. Widely used in classical and jazz music for solo performances, ensemble use, chamber music and accompaniment, the piano is also popular as a tool for composing and rehearsal. Although not portable and often expensive, the piano's versatility and ubiquity have made it one of the world's most familiar musical instruments.

Pressing a key on the piano's keyboard causes a padded (often with felt) hammer to strike steel strings. The hammers rebound, and the strings continue to vibrate at their resonant frequency. These vibrations are transmitted through a bridge to a sounding board that more efficiently couples the acoustic energy to the air. The sound would otherwise be no louder than that directly produced by the strings. When the key is released, a damper stops the string's vibration and the sound. See the article on Piano key frequencies for a picture of the piano keyboard and the location of middle-C. In the Hornbostel-Sachs system of instrument classification, pianos are considered chordophones.

The word piano is a shortened form of pianoforte (PF), the Italian word for the instrument (which in turn derives from the previous terms gravicembalo col piano e forte and fortepiano). The Italian musical terms piano and forte indicate "soft" and "strong" respectively, in this context referring to the variations in sound volume the instrument produces in response to a pianist's touch on the keys: the greater the velocity of a key press, the greater the force of the hammer hitting the strings, and the louder the sound of the note produced.

The piano was founded on earlier technological innovations. The first string instruments with struck strings were the hammered dulcimers.[3] During the Middle Ages, there were several attempts at creating stringed keyboard instruments with struck strings. By the 17th century, the mechanisms of keyboard instruments such as the clavichord and the harpsichord were well known. In a clavichord the strings are struck by tangents, while in a harpsichord they are plucked by quills. Centuries of work on the mechanism of the harpsichord in particular had shown the most effective ways to construct the case, soundboard, bridge, and keyboard for a mechanism intended to hammer strings.

The invention of the modern piano is credited to Bartolomeo Cristofori (1655–1731) of Padua, Italy, who was employed by Ferdinando de' Medici, Grand Prince of Tuscany, as the Keeper of the Instruments. He was an expert harpsichord maker, and was well acquainted with the body of knowledge on stringed keyboard instruments. It is not known exactly when Cristofori first built a piano. An inventory made by his employers, the Medici family, indicates the existence of a piano by the year 1700; another document of doubtful authenticity indicates a date of 1698. The three Cristofori pianos that survive today date from the 1720s.

While the clavichord allowed expressive control of volume and sustain, it was too quiet for large performances. The harpsichord produced a sufficiently loud sound, but had little expressive control over each note. The piano was likely formed as an attempt to combine loudness with control, avoiding the trade-offs of available instruments.

Cristofori's great success was solving, with no prior example, the fundamental mechanical problem of piano design: the hammer must strike the string, but not remain in contact with it (as a tangent remains in contact with a clavichord string) because this would dampen the sound. Moreover, the hammer must return to its rest position without bouncing violently, and it must be possible to repeat a note rapidly. Cristofori's piano action was a model for the many different approaches to piano actions that followed. Cristofori's early instruments were made with thin strings, and were much quieter than the modern piano—but compared to the clavichord (the only previous keyboard instrument capable of dynamic nuance via the keyboard) they were much louder and had more sustain.

Cristofori's new instrument remained relatively unknown until an Italian writer, Scipione Maffei, wrote an enthusiastic article about it in 1711, including a diagram of the mechanism. This article was widely distributed, and most of the next generation of piano builders started their work due to reading it. One of these builders was Gottfried Silbermann, better known as an organ builder. Silbermann's pianos were virtually direct copies of Cristofori's, with one important addition: Silbermann invented the forerunner of the modern damper pedal, which lifts all the dampers from the strings simultaneously.

Piano-making flourished during the late 18th century in the Viennese school, which included Johann Andreas Stein (who worked in Augsburg, Germany) and the Viennese makers Nannette Streicher (daughter of Stein) and Anton Walter. Viennese-style pianos were built with wood frames, two strings per note, and had leather-covered hammers. Some of these Viennese pianos had the opposite coloring of modern-day pianos; the natural keys were black and the accidental keys white. It was for such instruments that Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart composed his concertos and sonatas, and replicas of them are built today for use in authentic-instrument performance of his music. The pianos of Mozart's day had a softer, more ethereal tone than today's pianos or English pianos, with less sustaining power. The term fortepiano is now used to distinguish the 18th-century instrument from later pianos.

In the period lasting from about 1790 to 1860, the Mozart-era piano underwent tremendous changes that led to the modern form of the instrument. This revolution was in response to a preference by composers and pianists for a more powerful, sustained piano sound, and made possible by the ongoing Industrial Revolution with resources such as high-quality piano wire for strings, and precision casting for the production of iron frames. Over time, the tonal range of the piano was also increased from the five octaves of Mozart's day to the 7⅓ or more octaves found on modern pianos.


Label:

The label design is divided in two frames. The right one shows a beautiful picture with a close-up of Nibya Marino in her youth, with it sight pointing a bit upwards, and her hands together below her chin. Then, left one also present a picture, however this time of a poster that promotes an early concert of this pianist.

The concert was held, as it is said in the poster, on a Saturday June 24th, of a year that we do not know, in the auditoriom of the "Orquesta Sinfónica del Servicio Oficial de Difusión Radio Eléctrica (OSSODDRE), that is the national symphonic orchestra of Uruguay. The concert, as also expressed in the poster, has two functions, one at 18:00 and the other at 21:00, and was directed by Lamberto Baldi, one of the most known directors of the OSSSODRE.

The poster besides the information about the concert, shows another nice picture of Nibya, wearing a dress, and looking very young, surely younger even than in the right picture.

Finally, also from the poster, it could be seen that the coat of arms is included in it, so this label could be useful, for very deep searchers collectors of topics coat of arms, and also for collectors of animals, specially horses and cows, measurement instruments, specially scales, and Lighthouses, as a horse, a cow, a scale, and the Hill of Montevideo with his lighthouse are included in the Coat of Arms of Uruguay

The "Servicio Oficial de Difusión, Radiotelevisión y Espectáculos (SODRE)", that in english means "Official Service of Broadcasting, Radio, Television, and Shows", is an institute under the Ministry of Education and Culture of Uruguay, for the dissemination and generation of information, art and culture in general. It was created by Law No. 8,557 on December 19th of 1929.

Created as "Servicio Oficial de Difusión Radio Eléctrica", that could be translated in english to "Official Service of Radio Electric Broadcasting", its initial function was to broadcast cultural and information programs, that is transmit shows or performances of an artistic, scientific, illustrative or entertaining purposes for the spiritual improvement of the country's inhabitants. The law also mandated creation, among other things, of schools and conservatories, and to acquire and lease phonographic material, theatrical, cinematic, or printed music that relates to their activities, also to edit catalogs, programs or other publications, among other things. By the same law established a symphony orchestra, a chamber, a choir, a ballet, theaters, an audio library and other departments.

The SODRE now has four stable divisions: Symphony Orchestra, Chamber Music, Choir, and Corps de Ballet, and it also had the "Escuela Nacional de Danza", in english "National Dance School", also three medium wave radio stations, two in shortwave and five in modulated frequency. Besides it has a Museum of the Word, that treasures intellectuals recordings of speechs done by personalities from art, culture, society, politics, and a National Archive Image that, in addition to preserving a valuable historical heritage , it also produces and exhibits films and videos.

The "Orquestra Sinfónica del SODRE (OSSODRE)", the SODRE Symphony Orchestra, began operations on June 20th of 1931, directed by Vicente Pablo. With 103 musicians, began the path of longest-lived body in Uruguay in the official plan. In the history of the orchestra it is remarkable the contribution of Erich Kleiber. During World War II, Uruguay get benefited from the arrival of teachers who settled in America.

Then, directed by Kleiber, Albert Wolf and Fritz Busch, OSSODRE received the distinguished visitors as Jascha Horeinstein, Paul Paray, Clement Krauss, Hermann Scherchen, Victor de Sabata, Malcolm Sargent, Arthur Rodzinsky, Nikolai Malko, Paul Klechi, Witold Rowicki, Leopold Ludwig, Wilhelm Van Otterloo, Kiril Kondrashin, Jean Martinon, Enrique Jorda, Antal Dorati and Howard Mitchell, among others.

After that there came a crisis with the removal of most of the musicians and was called Lamberto Baldi to reorganize the orchestra. Following an international call, the OSSODRE reached its highest level, however, with the departure of Baldi, programs began to lose interest, and the Studio Theater fire in 1971 was a blow to the orchestra. Thereafter, he had no fixed place, so it has to rehearse and act in Teatro Solis and other rooms. This led to impairments in the technical and the beginning of a period of ups and downs.

The stable direction of Juan José Castro enriched the repertoire of the twentieth century, with fundamental contributions of De Falla, Hindemith, Stravinsky, Dmitri Shostakovich, Bela Bartok. From 1985 came back world renowned directors such as Simon Blech, Jorghe Rotter, Shunji Aretani, and new names like the Mexican Eduardo Diazmuñoz, Nicolas Rauss, Nicolas Pasquet or Brazilian David Machado.

At a later stage, was appointed artistic director Roberto Montenegro, who was inclined to more sober and traditional repertoire than its predecessor. Then headed Piero Gamba and stable David Machado as director from 1966. His unexpected death left a void that Piero Gamba was able to fill in the emergency.

Lamberto Baldi was born on 1895 in Orvieto, Italy, and passed away on 1979 in Montevideo, he was an Italian conductor and composer.

Baldi received his musical training in Orvieto, and then studied with Ildebrando Pizzetti in Florence. After working in various European countries, in 1926, he emigrated to South America. Until 1931 he was Director of the "Sociedad de Conciertos Sinfónicos" of San Pablo, and then he worked until 1942 (and again in 1951-1953) as director of the OSSODRE.

Then he conducted at the Colón Theater in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and wwas director of the Municipal Symphony Orchestra of that city from 1947 to 1949. Finally, from 1962 to 1963 he organized the Chamber Orchestra of the Gulbenkian Foundation in Lisbon Caloustre.

Baldi led mainly on the works of contemporary composers such as Claude Debussy, Paul Hindemith, Arthur Honegger, Igor Stravinsky, Eduardo Fabini and Héctor Tosar. He also orchestrated the opera Euridice by Jacopo Peri, who had worldwide success after its premiere on 1949 in Montevideo.


Block:

The block design is nice and reinforces the content of stamps and label. The major highlight of it is the inclusion of another picture, surely from the same concert as the one of the stamp photograph, in which Nibya's hands receive the main attention, as they are placed above the stamps and between the two legends of the block, that repeats the ones of the stamp, that are "Prominent personalities of Uruguay, and the name of the pianist.

The picture mentioned it is blurred and faded as one goes from up to down, and the design is completed with a set of four stylized icons of grand pianos to show the inks used to print the block.


FDC:

The cancelation is quite simple, besides the legends present in both stamp and block, that express the name of this anual serie, and the name of the personality chosen this year, i also includes a section of the keyboard of a piano.

Then, about the cover of the FDC, it is a special one, specially built for this release. However, the design of the cover it is intentionally not fully original, as is it is follows the same pattern of the one made for the release of this serie of prominent personalities of Uruguay of past year. The only difference is that now "Sra. Nibya Mariño" replaces "Cr. Enrique V. Iglesias" of the previous cover, however maintaining the same stylized font.


If you consider that there are another topics in this stamp, that were not spot in this review, you are encouraged to telling me about them, so please do not hesitate to post a comment. I would appreciate your help very much.

URU - 2013 - #010 - COVER Sent on First Day - PROMINENT PERSONALITIES OF URUGUAY, NIBYA MARIÑO


Uruguay - 2013 - Prominent personalities of Uruguay, Nibya Mariño


If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.


URU - 2013 - #010 - FDC Sent on First Day - PROMINENT PERSONALITIES OF URUGUAY, NIBYA MARIÑO


Uruguay - 2013 - Prominent personalities of Uruguay, Nibya Mariño


If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.


URU - 2013 - #010 - FDC not Sent - PROMINENT PERSONALITIES OF URUGUAY, NIBYA MARIÑO


Uruguay - 2013 - Prominent personalities of Uruguay, Nibya Mariño


If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.


URU - 2013 - #010 - BLOCK - PROMINENT PERSONALITIES OF URUGUAY, NIBYA MARIÑO


Uruguay - 2013 - Prominent personalities of Uruguay, Nibya Mariño


If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.


URU - 2013 - #010 - SERIE [2x2] with LABEL - PROMINENT PERSONALITIES OF URUGUAY, NIBYA MARIÑO


Uruguay - 2013 - Prominent personalities of Uruguay, Nibya Mariño


If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.


URU - 2013 - #010 - SERIE [1x2] with LABEL - PROMINENT PERSONALITIES OF URUGUAY, NIBYA MARIÑO


Uruguay - 2013 - Prominent personalities of Uruguay, Nibya Mariño


If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.


URU - 2013 - #010 - SERIE - PROMINENT PERSONALITIES OF URUGUAY, NIBYA MARIÑO


Uruguay - 2013 - Prominent personalities of Uruguay, Nibya Mariño


Options:

SERIE --- 1,40 EUR
SERIE [1X2] with LABEL --- 3,20 EUR
SERIE [2X2] with LABEL --- 5,60 EUR
BLOCK --- 10,00 EUR
FDC not Sent --- 2,80 EUR
FDC Sent on First Day --- 9,00 EUR
COVER Sent on First Day --- 6,00 EUR

If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.



Issue information:

Country: Uruguay
Date: March 22nd, 2013
Printed: 15.000 copies

Stamp Shape and Size: Rectangular [39 mm. x 27 mm.]
Perforation: Circular
Gum: Water Activated

Block Configuration: 8 stamps [3 x 3] and one Label at position 2,2
[ [STAMP, STAMP, STAMP]
[STAMP, LABEL, STAMP]
[STAMP, STAMP, STAMP] ]
Block Shape and Size: Rectangular [150 mm. x 133 mm.]

FDC Type: Special for this issue
FDC Shape and Size: Rectangular [169 mm. x 89 mm.]
Cover Shape and Size: Rectangular [241 mm. x 159 mm.]

Catalogue information:

Michel: No Data Available
Ivert: No Data Available
Scott: No Data Available
Stanley & Gibbons: No Data Available

Topics:

Issue:

This stamp is a new release of an annually that is being issued since last year about prominent personalities of Uruguay. This year, the honour of being chosen for this serie, it is for Nibya Mariño, a contemporary classical pianist from Uruguay.

The stamp, which was released just one day before the 94th birthday of Nibya, shows a picture of her, deeply concentrated and with fierce attitude, with his hands over a black grand piano, in one of his recent concertos.

The design is completed with the logo of the serie with the legend "Personalidades destacadas del Uruguay", that in english means "Prominent personalities of Uruguay", crossed with a white and sky-blue national ribbon, and bellow of this legend, the name of the pianist honoured.

This release repeats the block configuration introduced in the eight issue of this year about soccer team "Defensor", and adds an unique label in the center position of the block, making it a valuable collector item, as it exist only one for each eight stamps that composes the block. Both Label and block design will be described later, each one in their respective sections.

In relation to the annually serie, this second release shows that there is from a wide domain that the personalities are selected, as the other personality selected was from a completely different activity, as it was Enrique Iglesias, an also contemporanean, however an economist man, that received global recognition after being elected president of the Inter-American Development Bank in 1988.

Finally, another topics that could be considered to be present in this stamp are: women, music, musical instruments, wood, and gray hair.

Nybia Marino Bellini was born on March 23th of 1919 in Montevideo, and is a worldwide known Uruguayan classical pianist.

He began his musical training being very small with Master William Kolischer. He debuted at the age of six years, and only a few years later, still being a little girl, she gives a concert at the theater "Colón" in Buenos Aires, playing the Concerto in LA minor Op 54 by Robert Schumann, under the direction of Ernest Ansermet.

He traveled to Paris to improve her technique, where she took part in several competitions, standing out his performance in Brussels, in the Isaye contest, where she was the best and get very good returns. From there, Mariño began a series of concerts throughout Europe, Latin America and the United States.

He continued her studies in the United States with Claudio Arrau, considered the greatest pianist in the world. In this country recorded three CDs, two works by Schumann and the other with the Concerto for Two Pianos of Poulenc with the also Uruguayan Enrique Graf and an orchestra, under the direction of David Stohl.

She had played in the most important theaters of the world, both in the U.S. and Europe. He formed a remembered duo with Hugo Balzo. In 1994 she received an award from the Organization of American States (OAS) for her contribution to the artistic community of the Americas.

In late March 2009 he was honored for his 90 years of life. The concert, organized by SODRE Symphony Orchestra under the direction of maestro Piero Gamba, included the Piano Concerto No. 4 Op 58 by Ludwig van Beethoven.

She is married to Walter Pintos Surmani (son of well known uruguayan architect Walter Pintos Risso), and is the mother of Sergio Pintos Marino.

The piano is a musical instrument played by means of a keyboard. Widely used in classical and jazz music for solo performances, ensemble use, chamber music and accompaniment, the piano is also popular as a tool for composing and rehearsal. Although not portable and often expensive, the piano's versatility and ubiquity have made it one of the world's most familiar musical instruments.

Pressing a key on the piano's keyboard causes a padded (often with felt) hammer to strike steel strings. The hammers rebound, and the strings continue to vibrate at their resonant frequency. These vibrations are transmitted through a bridge to a sounding board that more efficiently couples the acoustic energy to the air. The sound would otherwise be no louder than that directly produced by the strings. When the key is released, a damper stops the string's vibration and the sound. See the article on Piano key frequencies for a picture of the piano keyboard and the location of middle-C. In the Hornbostel-Sachs system of instrument classification, pianos are considered chordophones.

The word piano is a shortened form of pianoforte (PF), the Italian word for the instrument (which in turn derives from the previous terms gravicembalo col piano e forte and fortepiano). The Italian musical terms piano and forte indicate "soft" and "strong" respectively, in this context referring to the variations in sound volume the instrument produces in response to a pianist's touch on the keys: the greater the velocity of a key press, the greater the force of the hammer hitting the strings, and the louder the sound of the note produced.

The piano was founded on earlier technological innovations. The first string instruments with struck strings were the hammered dulcimers.[3] During the Middle Ages, there were several attempts at creating stringed keyboard instruments with struck strings. By the 17th century, the mechanisms of keyboard instruments such as the clavichord and the harpsichord were well known. In a clavichord the strings are struck by tangents, while in a harpsichord they are plucked by quills. Centuries of work on the mechanism of the harpsichord in particular had shown the most effective ways to construct the case, soundboard, bridge, and keyboard for a mechanism intended to hammer strings.

The invention of the modern piano is credited to Bartolomeo Cristofori (1655–1731) of Padua, Italy, who was employed by Ferdinando de' Medici, Grand Prince of Tuscany, as the Keeper of the Instruments. He was an expert harpsichord maker, and was well acquainted with the body of knowledge on stringed keyboard instruments. It is not known exactly when Cristofori first built a piano. An inventory made by his employers, the Medici family, indicates the existence of a piano by the year 1700; another document of doubtful authenticity indicates a date of 1698. The three Cristofori pianos that survive today date from the 1720s.

While the clavichord allowed expressive control of volume and sustain, it was too quiet for large performances. The harpsichord produced a sufficiently loud sound, but had little expressive control over each note. The piano was likely formed as an attempt to combine loudness with control, avoiding the trade-offs of available instruments.

Cristofori's great success was solving, with no prior example, the fundamental mechanical problem of piano design: the hammer must strike the string, but not remain in contact with it (as a tangent remains in contact with a clavichord string) because this would dampen the sound. Moreover, the hammer must return to its rest position without bouncing violently, and it must be possible to repeat a note rapidly. Cristofori's piano action was a model for the many different approaches to piano actions that followed. Cristofori's early instruments were made with thin strings, and were much quieter than the modern piano—but compared to the clavichord (the only previous keyboard instrument capable of dynamic nuance via the keyboard) they were much louder and had more sustain.

Cristofori's new instrument remained relatively unknown until an Italian writer, Scipione Maffei, wrote an enthusiastic article about it in 1711, including a diagram of the mechanism. This article was widely distributed, and most of the next generation of piano builders started their work due to reading it. One of these builders was Gottfried Silbermann, better known as an organ builder. Silbermann's pianos were virtually direct copies of Cristofori's, with one important addition: Silbermann invented the forerunner of the modern damper pedal, which lifts all the dampers from the strings simultaneously.

Piano-making flourished during the late 18th century in the Viennese school, which included Johann Andreas Stein (who worked in Augsburg, Germany) and the Viennese makers Nannette Streicher (daughter of Stein) and Anton Walter. Viennese-style pianos were built with wood frames, two strings per note, and had leather-covered hammers. Some of these Viennese pianos had the opposite coloring of modern-day pianos; the natural keys were black and the accidental keys white. It was for such instruments that Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart composed his concertos and sonatas, and replicas of them are built today for use in authentic-instrument performance of his music. The pianos of Mozart's day had a softer, more ethereal tone than today's pianos or English pianos, with less sustaining power. The term fortepiano is now used to distinguish the 18th-century instrument from later pianos.

In the period lasting from about 1790 to 1860, the Mozart-era piano underwent tremendous changes that led to the modern form of the instrument. This revolution was in response to a preference by composers and pianists for a more powerful, sustained piano sound, and made possible by the ongoing Industrial Revolution with resources such as high-quality piano wire for strings, and precision casting for the production of iron frames. Over time, the tonal range of the piano was also increased from the five octaves of Mozart's day to the 7⅓ or more octaves found on modern pianos.


Label:

The label design is divided in two frames. The right one shows a beautiful picture with a close-up of Nibya Marino in her youth, with it sight pointing a bit upwards, and her hands together below her chin. Then, left one also present a picture, however this time of a poster that promotes an early concert of this pianist.

The concert was held, as it is said in the poster, on a Saturday June 24th, of a year that we do not know, in the auditoriom of the "Orquesta Sinfónica del Servicio Oficial de Difusión Radio Eléctrica (OSSODDRE), that is the national symphonic orchestra of Uruguay. The concert, as also expressed in the poster, has two functions, one at 18:00 and the other at 21:00, and was directed by Lamberto Baldi, one of the most known directors of the OSSSODRE.

The poster besides the information about the concert, shows another nice picture of Nibya, wearing a dress, and looking very young, surely younger even than in the right picture.

Finally, also from the poster, it could be seen that the coat of arms is included in it, so this label could be useful, for very deep searchers collectors of topics coat of arms, and also for collectors of animals, specially horses and cows, measurement instruments, specially scales, and Lighthouses, as a horse, a cow, a scale, and the Hill of Montevideo with his lighthouse are included in the Coat of Arms of Uruguay

The "Servicio Oficial de Difusión, Radiotelevisión y Espectáculos (SODRE)", that in english means "Official Service of Broadcasting, Radio, Television, and Shows", is an institute under the Ministry of Education and Culture of Uruguay, for the dissemination and generation of information, art and culture in general. It was created by Law No. 8,557 on December 19th of 1929.

Created as "Servicio Oficial de Difusión Radio Eléctrica", that could be translated in english to "Official Service of Radio Electric Broadcasting", its initial function was to broadcast cultural and information programs, that is transmit shows or performances of an artistic, scientific, illustrative or entertaining purposes for the spiritual improvement of the country's inhabitants. The law also mandated creation, among other things, of schools and conservatories, and to acquire and lease phonographic material, theatrical, cinematic, or printed music that relates to their activities, also to edit catalogs, programs or other publications, among other things. By the same law established a symphony orchestra, a chamber, a choir, a ballet, theaters, an audio library and other departments.

The SODRE now has four stable divisions: Symphony Orchestra, Chamber Music, Choir, and Corps de Ballet, and it also had the "Escuela Nacional de Danza", in english "National Dance School", also three medium wave radio stations, two in shortwave and five in modulated frequency. Besides it has a Museum of the Word, that treasures intellectuals recordings of speechs done by personalities from art, culture, society, politics, and a National Archive Image that, in addition to preserving a valuable historical heritage , it also produces and exhibits films and videos.

The "Orquestra Sinfónica del SODRE (OSSODRE)", the SODRE Symphony Orchestra, began operations on June 20th of 1931, directed by Vicente Pablo. With 103 musicians, began the path of longest-lived body in Uruguay in the official plan. In the history of the orchestra it is remarkable the contribution of Erich Kleiber. During World War II, Uruguay get benefited from the arrival of teachers who settled in America.

Then, directed by Kleiber, Albert Wolf and Fritz Busch, OSSODRE received the distinguished visitors as Jascha Horeinstein, Paul Paray, Clement Krauss, Hermann Scherchen, Victor de Sabata, Malcolm Sargent, Arthur Rodzinsky, Nikolai Malko, Paul Klechi, Witold Rowicki, Leopold Ludwig, Wilhelm Van Otterloo, Kiril Kondrashin, Jean Martinon, Enrique Jorda, Antal Dorati and Howard Mitchell, among others.

After that there came a crisis with the removal of most of the musicians and was called Lamberto Baldi to reorganize the orchestra. Following an international call, the OSSODRE reached its highest level, however, with the departure of Baldi, programs began to lose interest, and the Studio Theater fire in 1971 was a blow to the orchestra. Thereafter, he had no fixed place, so it has to rehearse and act in Teatro Solis and other rooms. This led to impairments in the technical and the beginning of a period of ups and downs.

The stable direction of Juan José Castro enriched the repertoire of the twentieth century, with fundamental contributions of De Falla, Hindemith, Stravinsky, Dmitri Shostakovich, Bela Bartok. From 1985 came back world renowned directors such as Simon Blech, Jorghe Rotter, Shunji Aretani, and new names like the Mexican Eduardo Diazmuñoz, Nicolas Rauss, Nicolas Pasquet or Brazilian David Machado.

At a later stage, was appointed artistic director Roberto Montenegro, who was inclined to more sober and traditional repertoire than its predecessor. Then headed Piero Gamba and stable David Machado as director from 1966. His unexpected death left a void that Piero Gamba was able to fill in the emergency.

Lamberto Baldi was born on 1895 in Orvieto, Italy, and passed away on 1979 in Montevideo, he was an Italian conductor and composer.

Baldi received his musical training in Orvieto, and then studied with Ildebrando Pizzetti in Florence. After working in various European countries, in 1926, he emigrated to South America. Until 1931 he was Director of the "Sociedad de Conciertos Sinfónicos" of San Pablo, and then he worked until 1942 (and again in 1951-1953) as director of the OSSODRE.

Then he conducted at the Colón Theater in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and wwas director of the Municipal Symphony Orchestra of that city from 1947 to 1949. Finally, from 1962 to 1963 he organized the Chamber Orchestra of the Gulbenkian Foundation in Lisbon Caloustre.

Baldi led mainly on the works of contemporary composers such as Claude Debussy, Paul Hindemith, Arthur Honegger, Igor Stravinsky, Eduardo Fabini and Héctor Tosar. He also orchestrated the opera Euridice by Jacopo Peri, who had worldwide success after its premiere on 1949 in Montevideo.


Block:

The block design is nice and reinforces the content of stamps and label. The major highlight of it is the inclusion of another picture, surely from the same concert as the one of the stamp photograph, in which Nibya's hands receive the main attention, as they are placed above the stamps and between the two legends of the block, that repeats the ones of the stamp, that are "Prominent personalities of Uruguay, and the name of the pianist.

The picture mentioned it is blurred and faded as one goes from up to down, and the design is completed with a set of four stylized icons of grand pianos to show the inks used to print the block.


FDC:

The cancelation is quite simple, besides the legends present in both stamp and block, that express the name of this anual serie, and the name of the personality chosen this year, i also includes a section of the keyboard of a piano.

Then, about the cover of the FDC, it is a special one, specially built for this release. However, the design of the cover it is intentionally not fully original, as is it is follows the same pattern of the one made for the release of this serie of prominent personalities of Uruguay of past year. The only difference is that now "Sra. Nibya Mariño" replaces "Cr. Enrique V. Iglesias" of the previous cover, however maintaining the same stylized font.


If you consider that there are another topics in this stamp, that were not spot in this review, you are encouraged to telling me about them, so please do not hesitate to post a comment. I would appreciate your help very much.

Friday, June 28, 2013

URU - 2013 - #005 - SERIE - RURAL WORKER RIGHTS, DAIRY WORKER


Uruguay - 2013 - Permanent Serie of Rural Worker Rights, Dairy worker


Options:

SERIE --- 4,60 EUR
SERIE [2X2] --- 18,00 EUR
FDC not Sent --- 6,00 EUR
FDC Sent on First Day --- 9,00 EUR
COVER Sent on First Day --- 6,00 EUR

If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.



Issue information:

Country: Uruguay
Date: March 8th, 2013
Printed: 200.000 copies

Stamp Shape and Size: Rectangular [27 mm. x 20 mm.]
Perforation: Lines
Gum: Self Adhesive

Block Configuration: 25 stamps [5 x 5]
Block Shape and Size: Rectangular [219 mm. x 195 mm.]

FDC Type: Normal
FDC Shape and Size: Rectangular [165 mm. x 105 mm.]
Cover Shape and Size: Rectangular [241 mm. x 159 mm.]

Catalogue information:

Michel: No Data Available
Ivert: No Data Available
Scott: No Data Available
Stanley & Gibbons: No Data Available

Topics:

Issue:

This stamp is the forth release of the permanent serie already mentioned, thought to spread awareness about the right of rural works enshrined in law 18.441, added in Uruguay law system on December 24th, 2008.

This permanent serie will be compounded by many stamps, eight already were issued at the moment was written this article, and in each of them a different rural activity, and in particular, the rural worker involved in it, will be focus of the issue.

In this particular issue, the dairy worker is the activity choosen, and the design for depicting this task was to show a women milking a Holsteins cow with a milking machine. The selection of a woman in duty adds the topic of gender equality at job, that around the globe it is a problem still unsolved.

The design of the stamps shows the scene of a woman wearing rubber gloves connecting the teatcups of the milking machine on cow teats. Behind she, there are three steel milk churns, and far away another cow is laying in the grass that cover half the desing of the stamp, leaving the other half to a bright sky.

The right of rural works enshrined in law 18.441 were: Limitation of labour to 8 hours a day; Payment of overtime for time which exceeds the legal time; Intermediate rest for continuous-time workers; Free day between 12 hours labour days; Weekly free day.

Other rural worker rights that are not included in law 18.441, however very important for them are: Freedom of union association; Collective bargaining; Participation in the Councils of wage.

A dairy is a business enterprise established for the harvesting of animal milk – mostly from cows or goats, but also from buffalo, sheep, horses or camels – for human consumption. A dairy is typically located on a dedicated dairy farm or section of a multi-purpose farm that is concerned with the harvesting of milk.

Milk producing animals have been domesticated for thousands of years. Initially, they were part of the subsistence farming that nomads engaged in. As the community moved about the country, their animals accompanied them. Protecting and feeding the animals were a big part of the symbiotic relationship between the animals and the herders.

In the more recent past, people in agricultural societies owned dairy animals that they milked for domestic and local (village) consumption, a typical example of a cottage industry. The animals might serve multiple purposes (for example, as a draught animal for pulling a plough as a youngster, and at the end of its useful life as meat). In this case the animals were normally milked by hand and the herd size was quite small, so that all of the animals could be milked in less than an hour—about 10 per milker. These tasks were performed by a dairymaid (dairywoman) or dairyman. The word dairy harkens back to Middle English dayerie, deyerie, from deye (female servant or dairymaid) and further back to Old English dæge (kneader of bread).

With industrialisation and urbanisation, the supply of milk became a commercial industry, with specialised breeds of cattle being developed for dairy, as distinct from beef or draught animals. Initially, more people were employed as milkers, but it soon turned to mechanisation with machines designed to do the milking.

Historically, the milking and the processing took place close together in space and time: on a dairy farm. People milked the animals by hand; on farms where only small numbers are kept, hand-milking may still be practiced. Hand-milking is accomplished by grasping the teats (often pronounced tit or tits) in the hand and expressing milk either by squeezing the fingers progressively, from the udder end to the tip, or by squeezing the teat between thumb and index finger, then moving the hand downward from udder towards the end of the teat. The action of the hand or fingers is designed to close off the milk duct at the udder (upper) end and, by the movement of the fingers, close the duct progressively to the tip to express the trapped milk. Each half or quarter of the udder is emptied one milk-duct capacity at a time.

The stripping action is repeated, using both hands for speed. Both methods result in the milk that was trapped in the milk duct being squirted out the end into a bucket that is supported between the knees (or rests on the ground) of the milker, who usually sits on a low stool.

Traditionally the cow, or cows, would stand in the field or paddock while being milked. Young stock, heifers, would have to be trained to remain still to be milked. In many countries, the cows were tethered to a post and milked. The problem with this method is that it relies on quiet, tractable beasts, because the hind end of the cow is not restrained.

When it became necessary to milk larger cows, the cows would be brought to a shed or barn that was set up with bails (stalls) where the cows could be confined while they were milked. One person could milk more cows this way, as many as 20 for a skilled worker. But having cows standing about in the yard and shed waiting to be milked is not good for the cow, as she needs as much time in the paddock grazing as is possible. It is usual to restrict the twice-daily milking to a maximum of an hour and a half each time. It makes no difference whether one milks 10 or 1000 cows, the milking time should not exceed a total of about three hours each day for any cow.

As herd sizes increased there was more need to have efficient milking machines, sheds, milk-storage facilities (vats), bulk-milk transport and shed cleaning capabilities and the means of getting cows from paddock to shed and back.

Farmers found that cows would abandon their grazing area and walk towards the milking area when the time came for milking. This is not surprising as, in the flush of the milking season, cows presumably get very uncomfortable with udders engorged with milk, and the place of relief for them is the milking shed.

Most dairy farmers milk their cows with absolute regularity at a minimum of twice a day, with some high-producing herds milking up to four times a day to lessen the weight of large volumes of milk in the udder of the cow. This daily milking routine goes on for about 300 to 320 days per year that the cow stays in milk. Some small herds are milked once a day for about the last 20 days of the production cycle but this is not usual for large herds. If a cow is left unmilked just once she is likely to reduce milk-production almost immediately and the rest of the season may see her dried off (giving no milk) and still consuming feed for no production. However, once-a-day milking is now being practised more widely in New Zealand for profit and lifestyle reasons. This is effective because the fall in milk yield is at least partially offset by labour and cost savings from milking once per day. This compares to some intensive farm systems in the United States that milk three or more times per day due to higher milk yields per cow and lower marginal labor costs.

Farmers who are contracted to supply liquid milk for human consumption (as opposed to milk for processing into butter, cheese, and so on—see milk) often have to manage their herd so that the contracted number of cows are in milk the year round, or the required minimum milk output is maintained. This is done by mating cows outside their natural mating time so that the period when each cow in the herd is giving maximum production is in rotation throughout the year.

Northern hemisphere farmers who keep cows in barns almost all the year usually manage their herds to give continuous production of milk so that they get paid all year round. In the southern hemisphere the cooperative dairying systems allow for two months on no productivity because their systems are designed to take advantage of maximum grass and milk production in the spring and because the milk processing plants pay bonuses in the dry (winter) season to carry the farmers through the mid-winter break from milking. It also means that cows have a rest from milk production when they are most heavily pregnant. Some year-round milk farms are penalised financially for over-production at any time in the year by being unable to sell their overproduction at current prices.

Holsteins (also known as Holstein-Friesians) are a breed of cattle known today as the world's highest-production dairy animals. Originating in Europe, Friesians were bred in what is now the Netherlands and more specifically in the two northern provinces of North Holland and Friesland, and northern Germany, more specifically what is now Schleswig-Holstein. The animals were the regional cattle of the Frisians and the Saxons. The Dutch breeders bred and oversaw the development of the breed with the goal of obtaining animals that could best use grass, the area's most abundant resource. Over the centuries, the result was a high-producing, black-and-white dairy cow. It is black and white due to artificial selection by the breeders.

With the growth of the New World markets began to develop for milk in North America, and dairy breeders turned to the Netherlands for their livestock. After about 8,800 Friesians (black pied Germans) had been imported, disease problems in Europe led to the cessation of imports to the United States.

In Europe, the breed is used for milk in the north, and meat in the south. Since 1945, European national development has led to cattle breeding and dairy products becoming increasingly regionalized. More than 80% of dairy production is to be found to the north of a line joining Bordeaux and Venice, where more than 60% of the total cattle numbers are found. This change led to the need for specialized animals for dairy (and beef) production. Until this time, milk and beef had been produced from dual-purpose animals. The breeds, national derivatives of the Dutch Friesian, had become very different animals from those developed by breeders in the United States, who used Holsteins only for dairy production.

Breeders imported specialized dairy Holsteins from the United States to cross with the European black and whites. For this reason, in modern usage, "Holstein" is used to describe North American stock and its use in Europe, particularly in the North. "Friesian" denotes animals of a traditional European ancestry, bred for both dairy and beef use. Crosses between the two are described by the term "Holstein-Friesian".

Holsteins have distinctive markings and outstanding milk production. They are large, black-and-white marked animals that vary from mostly black to mostly white, or they can also be red and white.

A healthy calf weighs 40 to 45 kg or more at birth. A mature Holstein cow typically weighs 580 kg (1280 pounds), and stands 147 cm (58 inches) tall at the shoulder. Holstein heifers should be bred by 13 to 15 months of age, when they weigh over 360 kg (794 pounds). Generally, breeders plan for Holstein heifers to calve for the first time between 23 and 26 months of age. The gestation period is about nine and a half months.

Milking machines are used to harvest milk from cows when manual milking becomes inefficient or labour intensive. One early model was patented in 1907. The milking unit is the portion of a milking machine for removing milk from an udder. It is made up of a claw, four teatcups, (Shells and rubber liners) long milk tube, long pulsation tube, and a pulsator. The claw is an assembly that connects the short pulse tubes and short milk tubes from the teatcups to the long pulse tube and long milk tube. (Cluster assembly) Claws are commonly made of stainless steel or plastic or both. Teatcups are composed of a rigid outer shell (stainless steel or plastic) that holds a soft inner liner or inflation. Transparent sections in the shell may allow viewing of liner collapse and milk flow. The annular space between the shell and liner is called the pulse chamber.

Milking machines work in a way that is different from hand milking or calf suckling. Continuous vacuum is applied inside the soft liner to massage milk from the teat by creating a pressure difference across the teat canal (or opening at the end of the teat). Vacuum also helps keep the machine attached to the cow. The vacuum applied to the teat causes congestion of teat tissues (accumulation of blood and other fluids). Atmospheric air is admitted into the pulsation chamber about once per second (the pulsation rate) to allow the liner to collapse around the end of teat and relieve congestion in the teat tissue. The ratio of the time that the liner is open (milking phase) and closed (rest phase) is called the pulsation ratio.

The four streams of milk from the teatcups are usually combined in the claw and transported to the milkline, or the collection bucket (usually sized to the output of one cow) in a single milk hose. Milk is then transported (manually in buckets) or with a combination of airflow and mechanical pump to a central storage vat or bulk tank. Milk is refrigerated on the farm in most countries either by passing through a heat-exchanger or in the bulk tank, or both.

Milking machines keep the milk enclosed and safe from external contamination. The interior 'milk contact' surfaces of the machine are kept clean by a manual or automated washing procedures implemented after milking is completed. Milk contact surfaces must comply with regulations requiring food-grade materials (typically stainless steel and special plastics and rubber compounds) and are easily cleaned.

Most milking machines are powered by electricity but, in case of electrical failure, there can be an alternative means of motive power, often an internal combustion engine, for the vacuum and milk pumps.

A milk churn is a tall, conical or cylindrical container for the transportation of milk. It is sometimes referred to as a milk can.

Milk was originally distributed in 'pails', a lidded bucket with a handle. Often two pails would be carried on either end of a wooden yoke. Once the railways started carrying milk the pail proved less than ideal as it was top-heavy and tended to spill. Dairy farmers used a tall conical wooden container - a butter churn - to 'churn' the milk to make butter, and this proved to be preferable for the railways to transport. It held a lot more milk (about seventeen gallons) and its conical shape made it less likely to spill or topple over. These wooden churns were intrinsically heavy however and from the 1850s a steel version was introduced and soon became the standard. The name churn was retained for these containers although they were not themselves used for 'churning' butter.

As with British Railway Milk Tank Wagons. the milk churn was a standard size, the older galvanised iron conical type held 17 gallons, whilst the cylindrical type with the mushroom shaped lid introduced in the 1930s held ten gallons. Each churn carried a brass plate near the top to identify the owning company and when full it would have a white paper label (tied to the handle on the lid of the conical type and to the side handle of the cylindrical type), which was used for accounting purposes by the creamery or dairy.


Block:

The block, although it did not add any more topics, it has the peculiarity that all of the last autoadhesive blocks issued by Uruguay is presenting. This singularity is that, in autoadhesive issues, the perforation that generally exist between the stamps in the border of the block and the limit of the block itself, in this issues did not exist, creating many variations of the stamps in the block.

The variations generated are many. The most common, and the one that we could consider as the most representative stamp of the block, is the variation of the stamps that are not in the borders of the block, the block of 3x3 that is located in the center of the stamp.

Then, the other variations, in order of frequency in the block, are the three center stamps of the first column, having larger left margins, the three center in the fifth column having larger right margins, also the three center stamps of the fifth row, that present arger bottom margins.

There is also, as you already had imagined, the three center stamps of the first row, with the top margin extended, however, although the the ones of row two and three are equal, the other is a particular one, as it has the block number in it.

Finally, the four stamps of the corners, are each one a different variation of the stamp. Stamp at row-col position one-one has left and top margin extended, the one at position one-five has right and left margins augmented and also it includes the four squares to show the ink colours used to print the block. After that the remaining variation are the ones at position five-one, and five-five, with left and bottom, and right and bottom, margin increased respectively.


FDC:

The desing of the First Day Cancelation for all the permanent series is the same for a period of time. It is a fixed design that has a configurable date, that is set to the date of issue of each permanent serie stamp released.

The actual design chosen, is the one used since year 2012, and it shows a frontiers only map of Uruguay.


If you consider that there are another topics in this stamp, that were not spot in this review, you are encouraged to telling me about them, so please do not hesitate to post a comment. I would appreciate your help very much.

URU - 2013 - #005 - COVER Sent on First Day - RURAL WORKER RIGHTS, DAIRY WORKER


Uruguay - 2013 - Permanent Serie of Rural Worker Rights, Dairy worker


If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.


URU - 2013 - #005 - FDC Sent on First Day - RURAL WORKER RIGHTS, DAIRY WORKER


Uruguay - 2013 - Permanent Serie of Rural Worker Rights, Dairy worker


If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.


URU - 2013 - #005 - FDC not Sent - RURAL WORKER RIGHTS, DAIRY WORKER


Uruguay - 2013 - Permanent Serie of Rural Worker Rights, Dairy worker


If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.


URU - 2013 - #005 - SERIE [2X2] - RURAL WORKER RIGHTS, DAIRY WORKER


Uruguay - 2013 - Permanent Serie of Rural Worker Rights, Dairy worker


If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.


URU - 2013 - #005 - SERIE - RURAL WORKER RIGHTS, DAIRY WORKER


Uruguay - 2013 - Permanent Serie of Rural Worker Rights, Dairy worker


Options:

SERIE --- 4,60 EUR
SERIE [2X2] --- 18,00 EUR
FDC not Sent --- 6,00 EUR
FDC Sent on First Day --- 9,00 EUR
COVER Sent on First Day --- 6,00 EUR

If you are interested in any of this items, or any other items from Uruguay, just make a donation including your e-mail in the description.

I will contact you as soon I receive your donation, we agree on which items do you need, and I will discount the donation done to the amount of your purchase.



Issue information:

Country: Uruguay
Date: March 8th, 2013
Printed: 200.000 copies

Stamp Shape and Size: Rectangular [27 mm. x 20 mm.]
Perforation: Lines
Gum: Self Adhesive

Block Configuration: 25 stamps [5 x 5]
Block Shape and Size: Rectangular [219 mm. x 195 mm.]

FDC Type: Normal
FDC Shape and Size: Rectangular [165 mm. x 105 mm.]
Cover Shape and Size: Rectangular [241 mm. x 159 mm.]

Catalogue information:

Michel: No Data Available
Ivert: No Data Available
Scott: No Data Available
Stanley & Gibbons: No Data Available

Topics:

Issue:

This stamp is the forth release of the permanent serie already mentioned, thought to spread awareness about the right of rural works enshrined in law 18.441, added in Uruguay law system on December 24th, 2008.

This permanent serie will be compounded by many stamps, eight already were issued at the moment was written this article, and in each of them a different rural activity, and in particular, the rural worker involved in it, will be focus of the issue.

In this particular issue, the dairy worker is the activity choosen, and the design for depicting this task was to show a women milking a Holsteins cow with a milking machine. The selection of a woman in duty adds the topic of gender equality at job, that around the globe it is a problem still unsolved.

The design of the stamps shows the scene of a woman wearing rubber gloves connecting the teatcups of the milking machine on cow teats. Behind she, there are three steel milk churns, and far away another cow is laying in the grass that cover half the desing of the stamp, leaving the other half to a bright sky.

The right of rural works enshrined in law 18.441 were: Limitation of labour to 8 hours a day; Payment of overtime for time which exceeds the legal time; Intermediate rest for continuous-time workers; Free day between 12 hours labour days; Weekly free day.

Other rural worker rights that are not included in law 18.441, however very important for them are: Freedom of union association; Collective bargaining; Participation in the Councils of wage.

A dairy is a business enterprise established for the harvesting of animal milk – mostly from cows or goats, but also from buffalo, sheep, horses or camels – for human consumption. A dairy is typically located on a dedicated dairy farm or section of a multi-purpose farm that is concerned with the harvesting of milk.

Milk producing animals have been domesticated for thousands of years. Initially, they were part of the subsistence farming that nomads engaged in. As the community moved about the country, their animals accompanied them. Protecting and feeding the animals were a big part of the symbiotic relationship between the animals and the herders.

In the more recent past, people in agricultural societies owned dairy animals that they milked for domestic and local (village) consumption, a typical example of a cottage industry. The animals might serve multiple purposes (for example, as a draught animal for pulling a plough as a youngster, and at the end of its useful life as meat). In this case the animals were normally milked by hand and the herd size was quite small, so that all of the animals could be milked in less than an hour—about 10 per milker. These tasks were performed by a dairymaid (dairywoman) or dairyman. The word dairy harkens back to Middle English dayerie, deyerie, from deye (female servant or dairymaid) and further back to Old English dæge (kneader of bread).

With industrialisation and urbanisation, the supply of milk became a commercial industry, with specialised breeds of cattle being developed for dairy, as distinct from beef or draught animals. Initially, more people were employed as milkers, but it soon turned to mechanisation with machines designed to do the milking.

Historically, the milking and the processing took place close together in space and time: on a dairy farm. People milked the animals by hand; on farms where only small numbers are kept, hand-milking may still be practiced. Hand-milking is accomplished by grasping the teats (often pronounced tit or tits) in the hand and expressing milk either by squeezing the fingers progressively, from the udder end to the tip, or by squeezing the teat between thumb and index finger, then moving the hand downward from udder towards the end of the teat. The action of the hand or fingers is designed to close off the milk duct at the udder (upper) end and, by the movement of the fingers, close the duct progressively to the tip to express the trapped milk. Each half or quarter of the udder is emptied one milk-duct capacity at a time.

The stripping action is repeated, using both hands for speed. Both methods result in the milk that was trapped in the milk duct being squirted out the end into a bucket that is supported between the knees (or rests on the ground) of the milker, who usually sits on a low stool.

Traditionally the cow, or cows, would stand in the field or paddock while being milked. Young stock, heifers, would have to be trained to remain still to be milked. In many countries, the cows were tethered to a post and milked. The problem with this method is that it relies on quiet, tractable beasts, because the hind end of the cow is not restrained.

When it became necessary to milk larger cows, the cows would be brought to a shed or barn that was set up with bails (stalls) where the cows could be confined while they were milked. One person could milk more cows this way, as many as 20 for a skilled worker. But having cows standing about in the yard and shed waiting to be milked is not good for the cow, as she needs as much time in the paddock grazing as is possible. It is usual to restrict the twice-daily milking to a maximum of an hour and a half each time. It makes no difference whether one milks 10 or 1000 cows, the milking time should not exceed a total of about three hours each day for any cow.

As herd sizes increased there was more need to have efficient milking machines, sheds, milk-storage facilities (vats), bulk-milk transport and shed cleaning capabilities and the means of getting cows from paddock to shed and back.

Farmers found that cows would abandon their grazing area and walk towards the milking area when the time came for milking. This is not surprising as, in the flush of the milking season, cows presumably get very uncomfortable with udders engorged with milk, and the place of relief for them is the milking shed.

Most dairy farmers milk their cows with absolute regularity at a minimum of twice a day, with some high-producing herds milking up to four times a day to lessen the weight of large volumes of milk in the udder of the cow. This daily milking routine goes on for about 300 to 320 days per year that the cow stays in milk. Some small herds are milked once a day for about the last 20 days of the production cycle but this is not usual for large herds. If a cow is left unmilked just once she is likely to reduce milk-production almost immediately and the rest of the season may see her dried off (giving no milk) and still consuming feed for no production. However, once-a-day milking is now being practised more widely in New Zealand for profit and lifestyle reasons. This is effective because the fall in milk yield is at least partially offset by labour and cost savings from milking once per day. This compares to some intensive farm systems in the United States that milk three or more times per day due to higher milk yields per cow and lower marginal labor costs.

Farmers who are contracted to supply liquid milk for human consumption (as opposed to milk for processing into butter, cheese, and so on—see milk) often have to manage their herd so that the contracted number of cows are in milk the year round, or the required minimum milk output is maintained. This is done by mating cows outside their natural mating time so that the period when each cow in the herd is giving maximum production is in rotation throughout the year.

Northern hemisphere farmers who keep cows in barns almost all the year usually manage their herds to give continuous production of milk so that they get paid all year round. In the southern hemisphere the cooperative dairying systems allow for two months on no productivity because their systems are designed to take advantage of maximum grass and milk production in the spring and because the milk processing plants pay bonuses in the dry (winter) season to carry the farmers through the mid-winter break from milking. It also means that cows have a rest from milk production when they are most heavily pregnant. Some year-round milk farms are penalised financially for over-production at any time in the year by being unable to sell their overproduction at current prices.

Holsteins (also known as Holstein-Friesians) are a breed of cattle known today as the world's highest-production dairy animals. Originating in Europe, Friesians were bred in what is now the Netherlands and more specifically in the two northern provinces of North Holland and Friesland, and northern Germany, more specifically what is now Schleswig-Holstein. The animals were the regional cattle of the Frisians and the Saxons. The Dutch breeders bred and oversaw the development of the breed with the goal of obtaining animals that could best use grass, the area's most abundant resource. Over the centuries, the result was a high-producing, black-and-white dairy cow. It is black and white due to artificial selection by the breeders.

With the growth of the New World markets began to develop for milk in North America, and dairy breeders turned to the Netherlands for their livestock. After about 8,800 Friesians (black pied Germans) had been imported, disease problems in Europe led to the cessation of imports to the United States.

In Europe, the breed is used for milk in the north, and meat in the south. Since 1945, European national development has led to cattle breeding and dairy products becoming increasingly regionalized. More than 80% of dairy production is to be found to the north of a line joining Bordeaux and Venice, where more than 60% of the total cattle numbers are found. This change led to the need for specialized animals for dairy (and beef) production. Until this time, milk and beef had been produced from dual-purpose animals. The breeds, national derivatives of the Dutch Friesian, had become very different animals from those developed by breeders in the United States, who used Holsteins only for dairy production.

Breeders imported specialized dairy Holsteins from the United States to cross with the European black and whites. For this reason, in modern usage, "Holstein" is used to describe North American stock and its use in Europe, particularly in the North. "Friesian" denotes animals of a traditional European ancestry, bred for both dairy and beef use. Crosses between the two are described by the term "Holstein-Friesian".

Holsteins have distinctive markings and outstanding milk production. They are large, black-and-white marked animals that vary from mostly black to mostly white, or they can also be red and white.

A healthy calf weighs 40 to 45 kg or more at birth. A mature Holstein cow typically weighs 580 kg (1280 pounds), and stands 147 cm (58 inches) tall at the shoulder. Holstein heifers should be bred by 13 to 15 months of age, when they weigh over 360 kg (794 pounds). Generally, breeders plan for Holstein heifers to calve for the first time between 23 and 26 months of age. The gestation period is about nine and a half months.

Milking machines are used to harvest milk from cows when manual milking becomes inefficient or labour intensive. One early model was patented in 1907. The milking unit is the portion of a milking machine for removing milk from an udder. It is made up of a claw, four teatcups, (Shells and rubber liners) long milk tube, long pulsation tube, and a pulsator. The claw is an assembly that connects the short pulse tubes and short milk tubes from the teatcups to the long pulse tube and long milk tube. (Cluster assembly) Claws are commonly made of stainless steel or plastic or both. Teatcups are composed of a rigid outer shell (stainless steel or plastic) that holds a soft inner liner or inflation. Transparent sections in the shell may allow viewing of liner collapse and milk flow. The annular space between the shell and liner is called the pulse chamber.

Milking machines work in a way that is different from hand milking or calf suckling. Continuous vacuum is applied inside the soft liner to massage milk from the teat by creating a pressure difference across the teat canal (or opening at the end of the teat). Vacuum also helps keep the machine attached to the cow. The vacuum applied to the teat causes congestion of teat tissues (accumulation of blood and other fluids). Atmospheric air is admitted into the pulsation chamber about once per second (the pulsation rate) to allow the liner to collapse around the end of teat and relieve congestion in the teat tissue. The ratio of the time that the liner is open (milking phase) and closed (rest phase) is called the pulsation ratio.

The four streams of milk from the teatcups are usually combined in the claw and transported to the milkline, or the collection bucket (usually sized to the output of one cow) in a single milk hose. Milk is then transported (manually in buckets) or with a combination of airflow and mechanical pump to a central storage vat or bulk tank. Milk is refrigerated on the farm in most countries either by passing through a heat-exchanger or in the bulk tank, or both.

Milking machines keep the milk enclosed and safe from external contamination. The interior 'milk contact' surfaces of the machine are kept clean by a manual or automated washing procedures implemented after milking is completed. Milk contact surfaces must comply with regulations requiring food-grade materials (typically stainless steel and special plastics and rubber compounds) and are easily cleaned.

Most milking machines are powered by electricity but, in case of electrical failure, there can be an alternative means of motive power, often an internal combustion engine, for the vacuum and milk pumps.

A milk churn is a tall, conical or cylindrical container for the transportation of milk. It is sometimes referred to as a milk can.

Milk was originally distributed in 'pails', a lidded bucket with a handle. Often two pails would be carried on either end of a wooden yoke. Once the railways started carrying milk the pail proved less than ideal as it was top-heavy and tended to spill. Dairy farmers used a tall conical wooden container - a butter churn - to 'churn' the milk to make butter, and this proved to be preferable for the railways to transport. It held a lot more milk (about seventeen gallons) and its conical shape made it less likely to spill or topple over. These wooden churns were intrinsically heavy however and from the 1850s a steel version was introduced and soon became the standard. The name churn was retained for these containers although they were not themselves used for 'churning' butter.

As with British Railway Milk Tank Wagons. the milk churn was a standard size, the older galvanised iron conical type held 17 gallons, whilst the cylindrical type with the mushroom shaped lid introduced in the 1930s held ten gallons. Each churn carried a brass plate near the top to identify the owning company and when full it would have a white paper label (tied to the handle on the lid of the conical type and to the side handle of the cylindrical type), which was used for accounting purposes by the creamery or dairy.


Block:

The block, although it did not add any more topics, it has the peculiarity that all of the last autoadhesive blocks issued by Uruguay is presenting. This singularity is that, in autoadhesive issues, the perforation that generally exist between the stamps in the border of the block and the limit of the block itself, in this issues did not exist, creating many variations of the stamps in the block.

The variations generated are many. The most common, and the one that we could consider as the most representative stamp of the block, is the variation of the stamps that are not in the borders of the block, the block of 3x3 that is located in the center of the stamp.

Then, the other variations, in order of frequency in the block, are the three center stamps of the first column, having larger left margins, the three center in the fifth column having larger right margins, also the three center stamps of the fifth row, that present arger bottom margins.

There is also, as you already had imagined, the three center stamps of the first row, with the top margin extended, however, although the the ones of row two and three are equal, the other is a particular one, as it has the block number in it.

Finally, the four stamps of the corners, are each one a different variation of the stamp. Stamp at row-col position one-one has left and top margin extended, the one at position one-five has right and left margins augmented and also it includes the four squares to show the ink colours used to print the block. After that the remaining variation are the ones at position five-one, and five-five, with left and bottom, and right and bottom, margin increased respectively.


FDC:

The desing of the First Day Cancelation for all the permanent series is the same for a period of time. It is a fixed design that has a configurable date, that is set to the date of issue of each permanent serie stamp released.

The actual design chosen, is the one used since year 2012, and it shows a frontiers only map of Uruguay.


If you consider that there are another topics in this stamp, that were not spot in this review, you are encouraged to telling me about them, so please do not hesitate to post a comment. I would appreciate your help very much.

Donations

Imagine a world in which we all offered what we do best, and we all do what we like most to do.

Then, not only imagine it, but also live there. I'm already there, join us.

Hugs,
Diego

Share

In case you want to publish this article in another place, I will appreciate that you communicate with me first by adding a commentary in the article (click in "commentaries" underneath the the text). Commentaries are moderated so please do not hesitate to include your email address in them.

Hugs,
Diego